|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"An Automotive Love
Affair" Point / CounterPoint |
|
Joe tested the |
|
|
Overview:
|
Price |
Joe |
|
Hey
Joe: I’ll
try to stay objective but at forty something I am going through a strong
station wagon phase. I’m certain it has nothing to do with my age.
Although the rage today is all about SUVs, I would strongly argue that the
SAAB Wagon is a better option. It does everything better, off-roading
aside, than an SUV. From putting groceries inside, to real world safety
the 9-5 Wagon is a superior choice. This Wagon can carry the same volume
of stuff, as an SUV but is more comfortable and easier to use day in and
day out. The
most appealing aspect is the engine avec
hair dryer. OK, I mean engine and TURBO. Those
of us living at high altitude here in Colorado are really spoiled by the
added kick in the butt an engine receives from the turbo as it spins up to
force feed the engine, more than making up for the loss in atmospheric air
pressure.
|
Well
Mr. Cobb: The “key” thing ticks me off too. Like Porsche putting the ignition key on the left side. You told me that was because of the racing history when drivers would have to run across the track, jump in and start the car and go. Being able to turn the ignition with the left hand and put it in gear with the right reduced time. With Saab, I see not reason. Perhaps someone will e-mail us with the reason for the key placement. Someone told me it was because of the locking mechanism on the transmission for anti theft reasons. When you get used to it it’s not all that bad, but food crumbs get into it and the key fob just seems to be in the way all the time. Reasons aside, it’s poor placement in my view. Price, the wagon thing has more to do with age than I think any of us care to admit. However, since you’re not all that old I suspect you’re having a “practical attack” in comparing it to the very popular SUV. |
|
Price
Technical |
Joe
Technical |
|
The
2.3-liter inline 4 in the Wagon has the low-pressure turbo rated at 170
H.P. and 207 lb.-ft. of torque at a lower range. Incidentally, something
that has always bugged me is the claim from Volvo and SAAB on where the
torque is. In this case SAAB says full torque is from 1800 RPM on up. Try
it yourself sometime and see if this is the case. Stick the car in a high
gear (like forth or fifth) and floor it. As the tachometer passes 1800 RPM
see if there is positive manifold pressure being shown on the boost gauge.
If you have to keep slight brake pressure on so that the car won’t
continue to accelerate past this point. Doesn’t feel like there is any
real power here, nor does the boost gauge show it. Oh well, must be my
eyes. |
Price, I love when you talk dirty this way. I didn’t’ understand a word of what you said but I believe every word anyway. I sure feel humbled when you talk technical. I really try to follow you but if I tried this, the car would blow up. |
|
Price
Features & Design |
Joe
Features & Design |
|
Occupants
are swaddled in a wall of air bags (side torso and head coupled with the
industry standard front bags) and SAAB style force-reducing seat belts and
pre-tensioners. I
liked the nifty cargo tie-down system in the back, which reminds me of the
simplicity of the systems long found in over the road haulers. |
The thing that will stay with me a while is the air-conditioned seats. Wow, what a help on long trips or especially hot days. The cargo area is very good and the interior is spacious and comfortable as well, in spite of the fact that this is not a big car. The design is distinctly Saab and fit and finish is outstanding. One exception is I found the computer user-unfriendly. |
|
|
Joe
Performance & Handling |
|
The
brakes are strong and well balanced with no fade noticed until you start
driving aggressively in situations that require many repeated braking
applications. It
drives well and certainly capable of staying with any traffic. But I find
it to be too soft at anything over cruising mode. I’m not talking about
the ride; I am specifically talking about the pitch (fore and aft movement
of the chassis) and roll (the side to side movement of the chassis). They
still haven’t gone far enough to control the platform stability (chassis
motion). |
Smooth is what comes to mind most and the high quality gives a confidence that you’ll be able to keep the “rubber side down” in most challenging situations. I too liked the Turbo boost because it added to the driving confidence in passing situations. That burst of power eases my mind and adds a degree of safety to the trip. I like to feel the road and I had just tested a Buick Century with a super soft ride that made me feel out of control. And no wise cracks about being out of control. I suspect average Joe drivers are all out of control, relative to trained race drivers. |
|
Price
Pricing |
Joe
Pricing |
|
Good. |
Agree. |
|
Good News |
|
Dash layout is superior in the Wagon compared to other Saab’s. Strong brakes and the great torque of the standard low-pressure turbo engine. |
Quality built Swedish
car with attention to detail. Comfortable
ride. Great air-conditioned seats. Turbo power for passing ease. Practical
spacious interior and small enough to zip around easily. |
|
Bad News |
|
|
Front wheel drive
torque steering degradation. Some folks call this simply torque steer but
I call it torque seizure. In lower gears whilst turning the boost up, the
front suspension literally seizes. In this modern world there is no excuse
for that. Take an electronic steering system and integrate it with the ECU
(Engine Control Unit) and be done with it. On-Star Telematics
could be easier to use. I consider myself computer literate and yet this
one is not in my humble opinion. |
Less than
user-friendly on-board computer. Terrible ignition key placement and the
gas mileage is so-so. |
Point/CounterPoint Conclusion
|
Price |
Joe |
|
I love the new Saab Wagon, but the only catch is there are some serious competitors out there. If you like to be slightly out of the ordinary, this car is unquestionably the one to have. It has but one foible, but what auto doesn’t. In this price range, your only real choices are the Saab and the Volvo so you’re back to the GM vs. Ford argument. They’re both wonderful. You’ll have to decide this one on your own. Green Flag |
Overall I like the car but wouldn’t run right out and buy one. I guess I'd opt for the Volvo from a personal point of view, but I agree, Price that this and the Volvo are similarly distinctive. BMW’s and Mercedes are a little too “in” and you have to pay too high a premium for the badges. Green Flag |
The competition:
Audi A6 Avant $37,350, BMW 5-Series Sport Wagon $40,700-53,480, Mercedes Benz E
Class Wagon $47,950, Volvo V70 $32,400-34,900.
Gas Stats:
18 City and 24 Highway MPG.
Pricing:
MSRP range $33,120-40,175.
Legend:
Checkered
Flag =Winner in every category; Green Flag=If
you like it, go for it; White Flag=One lap to go, too early to tell;
Yellow Flag=Caution, go get a hot dog while they clean up the mess.
Your comments are welcomed. You can e-mail joe@autolove.com
Copyright © 2000 - Point CounterPoint