|
|
|
|
|
“So here's my point. Make ASC
mandatory for all vehicles with an SUV profile”. Merkel Weiss |
|
|
|
|
Sport Uts’s |
The other guys. |
|
|
|
|
“An
Automotive Love Affair” |
“A Simple Approach to Light
Truck Safety”. A discussion with Merkel Weiss
|
Overview:
Today's
fireside chat with Merkel Weiss arose from our passion for debating the
all-powerful automotive market for SUV’s (Sport Utility Vehicles).
Our
debate is over the fight for improved safety in light of the fact that we have
the technology to avoid inherent problems with this very popular and profitable
class of vehicle. They should be held to at least as high a standard, if not a
higher standard, than with passenger cars.
Take
your own straw pole and count the light trucks and SUV's on the road. You should
come up with about 40% of all passenger vehicles out there is a light truck or
SUV. And it is precisely for this reason of popularity and profitability that
the consumer should demand a higher standard of safety than is acceptable for
cars less prone to accidents.
Merkel:
Well
Joe, "A higher Standard" is right on. With the rise of SUV/pickup
truck population on the road, there is a profound effect on the operational
costs to society. The obvious costs involve the use of more petroleum products,
both fuel and motor oil, tire rubber, and so on. The less obvious costs show up
as parking requirements for larger vehicles, often high depreciation, and the
increased medical bills associated with crashes.
Joe:
Good
Merkel. Because you are a forensic scientist and reconstruct accidents in your
professional life, what are the problems?
Merkel:
Joe,
the mere fact that these are heavy vehicles is really no change at all in the
American demographic when viewed in the long run. Although cars were getting
lighter for a while and fuel economy numbers were on the rise in the 1980's, the
tide has turned again back to bigger, heavier vehicles that most American
drivers prefer.
The
difference is that now the roads are populated with crashworthy cars and larger,
stiffer, and vastly heavier light-truck-based SUVs. The result of a crash
between a car and an SUV is very often devastating in terms of property damage
or life. Trucks are stiffer and transmit more shock load to their passengers in
crashes, while their weight delivers more impact load to the other car at
impact.
There
has also been a dramatic increase in single vehicle rollover accidents. This is
because SUVs are without exception higher off the ground than cars. Statistics
show that the injuries sustained in this type of accident are usually more
serious than in a car. My take on this is simple. They go fast and feel safe
because they are heavy. Therefore people drive faster in them. Put another way,
when we build a steadier ladder you can be sure people will climb higher.
Ok
Merkel, so what solutions do you see?
Merkel:
In
1991, Mercedes-Benz unveiled a concept car called the C112. It had many unique
features which have since become industry standard, not the least of which was
the use of ABS (anti-lock braking system) to provide an automatic stability
control (ASC). In simple terms, if the tail comes out in a corner, ABS applies
the outside front brake until the rotation stops, and vice-versa. ASC is really
nothing more than a yaw-calibrated (spin) accelerometer, linked to 4-channel ABS
through some simple programming. Most of the components, like the ABS, already
exist in new vehicles today, and can be used off the shelf. Also, ASC works so
silently it is actually not even noticeable. The vehicle is out of control one
second, and back in control the next.
So
here's my point. Make ASC mandatory for all vehicles with an SUV profile. SUV
manufacturers do not seem willing to put ASC in each and every SUV they sell
even to limit their own liability, so it should be mandatory.
Joe:
Merkel,
how do you propose they do that?
Merkel:
Joe,
all you have to do is use some threshold aspect ratio, linked to the height off
the ground, such as the one already calculated by NHTSA as the rollover index.
Next, the federal government should require all vehicles beyond a certain height
aspect ratio to have ASC. Simple, effective, unobtrusive in operation, and
available technology would be used to solve a known problem.
Joe:
I
don’t know. Here we go again trying to protect us from ourselves. We just give
up more freedoms. Some people may want to feel in control and not rely on the
car to save them.
Merkel:
Well Joe, ASC only comes on at the initial onset of an emergency situation (a
spin) much more rapidly than a person could respond. It quietly stabilizes the vehicle
and then goes away. You can hardly notice it. If people insist on driving
SUV’s in traffic, then it is reasonable that certain avoidance maneuvers, that
are no problem for a car, could put an SUV out of control. Those who drive
smaller vehicles like Taurus or Maxima are at risk from SUV’s. If buyers
choose to drive SUV’s they should have the safety equipment to protect
themselves and others on the road.
Joe:
Ok,
that makes sense Merkel. You’ve made the point that the usefulness of this
class of vehicle is undeniable with all their pros, now we have the convincing
argument that the dangers of this “Lead weight on wheels” can be hazardous
to MY health. So I’ll buy a Hummer, go even bigger and protect myself that
way…
… just kidding Merkel.
I
see no reason why such technology should not be employed in the manufacture of
SUVs, but the how is the difficult answer. The liability is not great enough to
encourage carmakers to do it on their own, so what do we do? Should we lobby
congress, get a bill passed, run for public office and make a change?
Consumer
Recommendation:
Write your congressman and attach a copy of this discussion. We have the
technology. It is inexpensive technology. Not doing it represents a “Clear and
Present Danger” to everyone on the highways and byways of this country.
Therefore it demands a law to require carmakers to include ABS and ASC as
Standard Equipment and make their vehicles safer to operate.
Good News:
Technology allows for
products that can be better than ever.
Bad
News:
SUV manufacturers are
not being encouraged to incorporate the new technology in their vehicles.
Your
comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@autolove.com
Copyright ©
2003 – An Automotive Love Affair